(Deepshikha Gautam, Intern Journalist) Hathras: In the letter, it has been claimed on behalf of the main accused Sandeep that he used to have frequent talks with the victim. Significantly, in the phone call details of Sandeep and the victim’s family, the conversation between the two numbers was reported more than 100 times. However, the victim’s brother had denied that there was never any talk between his family and the accused. He also demanded that the recording be heard. In the letter, Sandeep claimed that “the victim was a girl from my village, with whom I had a friendship. We used to meet and sometimes talk on the phone. Our family did not like our friendship. On the day of the incident, I met him in the fields and he was accompanied by his mother and brother. At his behest, I immediately went home and started feeding the animals there with my father.”
It is written in the letter on behalf of the accused Sandeep that, “After some time I came to know from the villagers that I had befriended the victim, so his brother and mother have beaten him. She suffered severe injuries due to beating, she later died. I have never killed the victim nor done anything wrong.” In the Hathras gangrape case, where the police are treating the call details of the accused and the victim’s mobile numbers, the victim’s brother has rejected the call details. Based on the call details, the police said that there was a continuous phone conversation between the victim’s family and the main accused, which has been completely denied by the victim’s brother. The victim’s brother said that he never had any conversation with the accused. The phone number is definitely in the father’s name but never spoke to the accused. He alleged that an attempt was being made to discredit and pressure the family. He said that “My sister was illiterate, from where would she run the phone?
If there was talk, the recording should be heard.” The victim’s brother said that he lived in Ghaziabad. Only after getting information about this heinous incident with their sister came to Aligarh. Since then, were traveling around hospitals. He alleged that his family was being pressurized from all sides. Efforts are being made to save the accused.”
Investigation agencies have taken out the call details of the mobile phones of the four accused. Also, the CDR numbers of the family members of the victim have also been extracted. Police are matching where the location of the family of the accused and the victim was on the day of the incident.
The family members of the accused are constantly saying that they were not present at the time of the incident. It is being told that the police are also investigating whether there was a phone talk between the accused and the victim. How the relationship was as the two sides were around the house. According to sources, the main accused used to talk to the accused and the family of the victim in the call detail for the last several months. The police are now trying to find out what was the reason behind the incident when there was so much intimacy between the victim’s side and the accused. Sources say that call detail of both sides will play an important role in this case. On the other hand, SP Vineet Jaiswal of Hathras says that he has no information about the call details of both the parties. The SIT is investigating the case. CM Yogi Adityanath has given more time for an investigation to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the Hathras gangrape case. The SIT will now submit its report to the CM 10 days later.
About Post Author
